Is Digital Photography Superior Than Film Photography?

The world of photography has been changed forever by the arrival of digital cameras. Millions of people are getting involved in photography for the first time, thanks to the economy and convenience of digital photography. But the question is still often asked. Which is better: film or digital?

I use film, but if someone asks me whether they should purchase a film camera or a digital camera, I nearly always advocate digital. The answer is not so simple if someone asks me which is ‘better’ – film or digital?

The answer comes down what you mean by ‘better.’ Photography is many things to many people, so the merits of the medium depends on what you anticipate to get out of it.

In my business (a nature photography gallery), the single most important criteria is the calibre of the printed photograph. For me, film still provides superior calibre enlargements, even though darkroom printing has all but died out. These days, I get a high-resolution scan from the original film, and print my pictures digitally. This process gives me a superior calibre enlargement than a print from a digital camera. I am speaking about BIG enlargements here – A2 and sometimes larger.

So why do I advocate others to switch to digital photography (if they haven’t already)? Simply because not many people make their living selling framed photographs. Let’s grappling it, how many of us will ever print a pic larger than 8×12 inch (20x30cm)?

These days, in fact, how many of us ever get around to printing our pictures at all? The day of the pic album has passed. This day most pictures will only ever exist as digital files. We can share them in emails, insert them into websites, use them as screensavers…for many people the intent of actually printing a pic is tiny more than a novelty.

So in the age of digital photography, what does film has to offer? Well, not much, except for the high cost of developing and printing (don’t forget you have to pay for apiece exposure, even the bad ones). Then there is the long delay between taking the pic and seeing the result. Finally, if you want to use your pic for any practical purpose, you will probably have to scan it to turn it into a digital file anyway.

So, is digital photography ‘better’ than film photography? In the modern world, which demands speed and convenience, yes. With your digital camera you can take all the pictures you like at no real cost, and see the results instantly. You don’t have to pay to print pictures you don’t want, and you can simply delete your unsuccessful images from your camera.

That’s not to state digital photography is perfect; far from it. I have already mentioned that your digital files are not as good as film for very huge enlargements, but there is more to it than that. The calibre of a digital print is a tiny ‘flatter’ than a pic printed from film. It might have plenty of colour and detail, but in ways that are hard to explain, it lacks the illusion of three-dimensional real life that you can get from film.

In the past, most digital photographers would laugh at me for suggesting such a thing. I suspect that was because after investing a small fortune in their new technological treasure, they were reluctant to admit that their new toy was not perfect in each way. Today, however, even the most committed digital convert seems willing to admit that the digital revolution has, for all its advantages, brought with it a level of compromise in quality.

Is there a solution? Of course there is, and it is called software. Whichever editing program you use, it is quite simple to ‘tweak’ your pictures to a standard that is as rich and three dimensional as a pic printed from film. These programs have become a fact of life for many photographers, but not everyone likes to use them or even knows how to. Then there are the grumpy old purists (like me) who feel that a well-exposed pic should not require enhancement to bring it up to standard.

So where does all this leave us? Is digital superior than film? For my purposes, no. For your purposes, most likely yes. If your priority is not large, high calibre prints, there is really very tiny reason to stick with film (other than nostalgia).

If you are shopping for a camera (SLR or compact), make it a digital. Just as important, take the time to learn how to use it. Photography is still about focus, aperture, shutter speed, composition and lighting. The digital vs. film debate means nothing if your camera is always switched to auto for taking snapshots. Oh, and get to know your computer…you’re going to need it.

More Film Photography Articles